Opens a personal Claude account to debug code.
Data path created
Protect enterprise assets and business interests from unsanctioned AI systems
AI tool, account, or agent
Trusted By
LLMs & AI are probably the next big thing after the Internet. It's going to be everywhere, whether you like it or not.
Think unauthorized ChatGPT usage, consumer AI accounts, browser-based chatbots, AI extensions, desktop copilots, embedded AI features, unauthorized AI APIs, AI agents and MCP-connected tools, and more. The list is virtually endless.
Personal accounts on otherwise-familiar AI services. Corporate data enters an environment outside every enterprise control you've built.
Employees don't adopt unauthorized AI to bypass security - they adopt it because it's fast, accessible, and useful. None of the actions below look malicious. Each one creates a new AI data path outside your governance boundary.
Opens a personal Claude account to debug code.
Data path created
Pastes a customer email into ChatGPT.
Data path created
Uploads a contract to an AI summarizer.
Data path created
Installs an AI browser extension.
Data path created
Connects an AI coding agent to an internal repository.
Data path created
Enables an AI feature inside a SaaS app without a security review.
Data path created
of organizations suspect or have evidence that employees are using prohibited public GenAI
Source: Gartner
Learn more →Blocking a service doesn't remove the business need behind it. Block any unauthorized AI tools your team uses, and employees don't stop using AI - they switch to whatever chatbot, browser extension, or "free" copilot solves their problem fastest.
Blocklists also fail as new AI applications appear and existing ones add AI capabilities.
Walled AI's comprehensive platform enables complete and total governance of Shadow AI. From detection to access control, and data protection to audit logging, Walled AI gives you the tools you need to meet the challenges posed by Shadow AI.
Identify sanctioned and unsanctioned AI usage.
Who is allowed to use which AI? Apply policy based on users, teams, and roles.
Enterprise RBAC
Mask sensitive information before it reaches external models. What information can be sent?
Walled Redact + Data Classification
Allow, block, or redirect AI usage according to policy.
Track AI activity and every policy decision. What AI-generated content is acceptable? Is the AI response trustworthy?
Walled Protect + Walled Correct
Maintain evidence of AI usage, controls, and outcomes. What happened across the organization?
Governance Dashboard
Effective detection requires visibility across multiple layers. Each one answers a different question - and has a different blind spot.
"Where is AI traffic going?"
Identify connections to known AI domains, APIs, model endpoints, and AI SaaS services - including destinations you've never seen before.
⚠️ Blind Spot
Network telemetry alone can't reliably tell you what data was submitted.
Detecting Shadow AI is only half the battle. Security teams must decide how to handle the interaction.
Choose from six powerful capabilities that enable complete shadow AI governance. The goal isn't to block all Shadow AI. The goal is to govern every interaction.
Approved AI, approved user, acceptable use.
AI is permitted, but activity is logged for visibility.
Allow the interaction, but mask sensitive information first.
Allow the tool, but limit certain users, data types, or use cases.
Prevent the interaction entirely.
Send the user to an approved enterprise AI environment instead.
Every AI interaction is logged with complete context. Security teams have full audit trails, not just a list of domains. Every decision is observable, every user is tracked, and compliance questions have immediate answers.
Govern Shadow AI without making a single compromise. Our platform supports private, on-premises deployment with near-zero latency.
Keep your data within your organization's boundaries while securely accessing external LLM capabilities
Which of these capabilities does your Shadow AI vendor support?
Move beyond messed up block lists. Experience full-fledged Shadow AI Governance now
Why blocking unsanctioned AI tools at the firewall doesn't fix the underlying policy gap - and what does.
Autonomous agents introduce their own version of shadow AI: unbounded tool access, unauthorised API calls, and silent data egress.
How shadow AI detection events feed directly into the same board-ready compliance reporting as your sanctioned AI activity.
Multi-modal PII masking for AI prompts. Protect all sensitive data across 50+ entity types.
Stop prompt injection, jailbreaks, and unauthorized AI use with 99.7% blocking accuracy.
Validate AI responses against ground truth, reduce hallucination rates from 12% to 0.3%.
Automatically classify data sensitivity across all AI interactions.
Department-level AI access controls, control who can use which LLMs.
Real-time monitoring and compliance reporting across every LLM.
Shadow AI is the use of AI applications, models, agents, integrations, or services without an organization's required visibility, approval, or governance controls. It includes personal ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini accounts, browser extensions, desktop copilots, embedded AI features inside approved SaaS tools, direct API calls, and AI agents or MCP-connected tools created outside approved workflows.
Effective Shadow AI detection combines signals from multiple layers - network/DNS, browser, endpoint, identity, SaaS, and the data actually submitted to a model - to identify unauthorized AI use. Each layer sees a different slice of the problem, so the right combination depends on your architecture and threat model.
A firewall or DNS control can flag connections to known AI destinations, but it typically can't tell you which user was involved, which account they used, or what data they submitted. Network visibility answers "where is AI traffic going" - it's strongest combined with browser, identity, and data-layer context.
The key question to ask any vendor is whether their detection architecture carries identity context alongside the AI destination - not just the domain. The same AI service can be low-risk under a managed corporate account and high-risk under an unmanaged personal one, so this distinction is a core evaluation criterion for enterprise Shadow AI programs.
Not usually. A blanket block tends to push employees toward other tools or unmanaged workarounds rather than eliminating the underlying need. A policy engine that can allow, monitor, protect (mask sensitive data), restrict, block, or redirect - decision by decision - keeps legitimate AI use flowing while still closing the actual risk.
Yes. AI browser extensions can read the contents of whatever page or document is open, and desktop AI applications run outside the browser entirely - both are common Shadow AI surfaces that a domain-only blocklist misses.
Increasingly, yes. Unauthorized agents introduce their own model calls, credentials, tool execution, and data connections. Once an agent can act through APIs and MCP-connected tools without a human initiating every step, Shadow AI stops being just a chatbot problem and becomes an identity and permissions problem too.
Discovery answers "what AI exists in my organization" and builds the inventory. Detection answers "what AI is being used right now" and enables real-time enforcement. Governance answers "what should happen when someone uses it" - connecting discovery and detection to policy: discover, detect, classify, decide, enforce, and audit.
WalledAI recognizes AI destinations at the browser and network layer it already governs for sanctioned tools, so no separate endpoint agent is needed to identify unsanctioned AI usage. Policy decides in real time whether to allow, protect, restrict, block, or redirect the interaction.
Yes. Rather than only blocking, WalledAI can classify the sensitive information in an interaction and have Walled Redact mask it before it reaches an external model - so the employee's work continues and the model gets the context it needs without the underlying sensitive values.
Yes. Every detected attempt - allowed, protected, restricted, blocked, or redirected - is logged with the user, AI destination, account type, data involved, and outcome, alongside your existing governance records, so it's part of the same evidence trail used for compliance reporting.